Up: Stat 3011
Stat 3011 Midterm 2
This problem requires a probability calculation for a general normal
distribution (Section 6.3 in the textbook). It is a ``forward''
problem (given x find a probability). The solution has two steps.
- Standardize
- Forward Look-up.
The standardization step is
Looking up
P(z > 2.6) in the normal table gives 0.0047.
This problem is about the sampling distribution of a sample proportion
(Section 7.3 in the textbook). The distribution of p is approximately
normal with mean and standard deviation
where
is the population proportion and n is the sample size.
In this problem
and n = 500, so
The rest of the problem is a probability calculation for a general normal
distribution, just like problem 1.
The standardization step is
Looking up
P(z < -0.895) in the normal table, we see the answer
is somewhere between 0.1867 and 0.1841 (either of these or anything in between
was accepted for full credit). The exact answer (obtained from Rweb) is
0.1854.
This problem is a small-sample confidence interval for a mean
(Section 8.4) in the textbook. The confidence interval is
In this problem
,
s = 123, and n = 3.
The t critical value for n - 1 = 2 degrees of freedom and 95% confidence
is 4.30 (looked up in the table of t critical values).
Thus the confidence interval is
which works out to
or
(-52.36, 558.36).
This problem is about the sample size needed to get a stated accuracy
for a confidence interval for a mean (Section 8.2 in the textbook).
If B is the half-width, the sample size is given by
Of course,
is not known, but we can estimate it by the
sample standard deviation of the preliminary sample, s = 1.44.
This gives
Rounding to the nearest integer gives n = 797.
This problem is about setting up the hypotheses for a hypothesis test
(Section 9.1 in the textbook). This is a test about proportions.
Thus the parameter (what Devore and Peck call the
population characteristic) is
.
The hypothesized value
(the only number in the problem statement) is 0.47 (probabilities are
numbers between zero and one, you must convert percents to this form).
Thus the null hypothesis is
The only remaining issue is the choice of >, <, or
in the
alternative hypothesis. The way to do this is to find the words in
the problem statement that are a paraphrase of the alternative hypothesis.
These are
improvement over the standard treatment
Since ``improvement'' corresponds to probability ``greater than,'' the
correct choice is >, and the alternative hypothesis is
This is a question about interpreting P-values (Section 9.3 in the textbook,
also Handout B).
The null hypothesis is rejected if
.
That is the case here
(
). Thus H0 is rejected. The null hypothesis corresponds
to blind guessing, no ESP. The alternative corresponds to better accuracy
than blind guessing, hence ESP. Thus accepting the alternative means accepting
ESP.
You might question whether the experiment indicates ESP by raising
non-statistical issues. Perhaps there was cheating or inadvertent queing.
But the hypothesis test provides evidence for ESP.
Two tails is twice one tail: P = 0.063.
Now
(
0.063 > 0.05) so we accept H0. And now the
experiment provides no evidence for ESP.
This is a large-sample test about means (Section 9.3 in the textbook).
The test statistic is
Looking up
P(z < - 2.108) in the normal table, we see the answer
is somewhere between 0.0179 and 0.0174, much closer to the latter than
the former (anything between 0.0174 and 0.0176 was accepted for full credit).
The exact answer (obtained from Rweb) is 0.0175.
Up: Stat 3011
Charles Geyer
1999-12-09