Green (1995) proposed an algorithm that involves
state-dependent mixing having mixing probabilities
that depend on the current state. There are a finite or infinite set of
transition kernels
,
, and state-dependent mixing
probabilities
. The overall transition kernel is
To make a move when at x, we choose kernel
with probability
and then simulate the next state with probability
.
No nice properties are transferred from the
to P, so we introduce
the substochastic kernels
. Then
, so if all of the
are reversible with respect
to
, then so is P, and if P is stochastic, then
is a stationary
distribution of P. Note that each
determines
and
through
and
so we may consider that we have been given the
to specify the algorithm.
A simple trick allows us to use the same argument when we are given a set
of substochastic kernels
,
, that sum to a substochastic
kernel, that is
Define the defect
and a new kernel
where I is the identity kernel, defined by
Then
is reversible with respect to any distribution
since
is trivially symmetric under the interchange of u and v. If we add
to our set of kernels, then the sum is stochastic.
Thus we have the following formulation of state-dependent mixing. Suppose we are given a set of substochastic kernels satisfying (1.7). Then the following combined update